Back to Evidence & Resource Library

Are our babies hungry? Food insecurity among infants in urban clinics

M.C. Burkhardt, A.F. Beck, R.S. Kahn, M.D. Klein
Clin Pediatr (Phila)

Background: Food insecurity (FI) is common, but studies in families with infants are rare.

Objectives: To determine prevalence of FI, assess the effect public benefits have on FI, assess strategies to stretch nutritional resources (eg, using generic formula), and investigate FI's relationship to anthropometric measurements.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was completed. FI was classified using the US Department of Agriculture's 6-item indicator set. RESULTS: A convenience sample of 144 infant caregivers was surveyed. Thirty-one percent endorsed FI. FI was more common among those receiving WIC and SNAP (39% vs 22%; P .05). Fifteen percent stretched infant formula (27% FI vs 9% food secure; P .01), 58% would not use generic formula, and 50% believed that generic and brand name formulas were not equivalent. There was no significant association between FI and anthropometric measurements.

Conclusions: FI and formula stretching were common, even among families receiving public benefits. Many families were cautious about using generic formula.

Burkhardt MC, Beck AF, Kahn RS, Klein MD. Are our babies hungry? Food insecurity among infants in urban clinics. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51(3):238-243. PMID: 22114199. DOI: 10.1177/0009922811426767.

View the Resource
Publication year
Resource type
Peer Reviewed Research
Outcomes
Social Needs/ SDH
Health & Health Behaviors
Population
Children and Youth
Social Determinant of Health
Food/Hunger
Study design
Other Study Design