A mixed methods investigation into GP attitudes and experiences of using social prescribing in their practice

Aim: Social prescribing (SP) enables clinicians to signpost patients to non-medical services in the community in order to support their psycho-social needs. SP has been promoted as a positive service delivery model for primary and community care; however, there are few data on the views of doctors working in this area on the effectiveness of SP and its implementation. 

Subject and methods: This study used a mixed methods approach to examine attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) on their use of SP. GPs completed an online survey (n = 102), provided narrative written responses (n = 55) and took part in semi-structured interviews on the topic (n = 8). 

Results: Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that 90% of respondents use SP in their practice, with significant factor loadings on six separate components. Thematic analysis revealed three main themes, which were then combined with the PCA components to derive overarching themes that underpin effective implementation of SP: (1) perceptions of effectiveness and efficacy of SP, (2) training and awareness, and (3) structure and operational delivery. 

Conclusion: This study is one of the first to explore attitudes of doctors to SP. Whilst data shows that most respondents are supportive of SP in principle, the analysis also reveals that there are specific barriers that need to be overcome to enable effective implementation.