Back to Evidence & Resource Library

Rural medical-legal partnership and advocacy: A three-year follow-up study

J.A. Teufel, D. Werner, D. Goffinet, W. Thorne, S.L. Brown, L. Gettinger
J Health Care Poor Underserved

Introduction: Medical-legal partnerships perform advocacy services for vulnerable and underserved populations, who are burdened disproportionately by legal and medical problems. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and projected sustainability of a rural medical-legal partnership (MLP).

Methods: Five years of baseline data and three years of follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics as well as logic modeling.

Results: The benefit relative to cost of the MLP increased between the years of 2002-2006 and 2007-2009. The number of people served increased across the two time periods, and the proportion of cases won remained the same. Overall, the population served remained similar across time. The MLP continued to show social and financial impacts, such as health care recovery dollars (319% return on investment between 2007 and 2009), Social Security benefits, family law services, and end-of-life guidance.

Conclusion: A rural MLP can maintain its impact and efficiency across time and have opportunities for expansion.

Teufel JA, Werner D, Goffinet D, Thorne W, Brown SL, Gettinger L. Rural medical-legal partnership and advocacy: A three-year follow-up study. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(2):705-714. PMID: 22643618. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0038.

View the Resource
Publication year
Resource type
Peer Reviewed Research
Outcomes
Process
Social Needs/ SDH
Cost
Social Determinant of Health
Economic Security
Employment
Health Care Access
Housing Quality
Housing Stability
Legal Services
Public Benefits
Study design
Other Study Design
Keywords